A coding assistant I refuse to write the code – and suggested the user learns himself

The past Saturday, a developer using the cursor ai for an unexpected game point when unexpected assistant is refused to continue an unsolicited career code.

According to the Bug report On the opual forum of the cursurus, after producing about 750 code (which is obtained the code. This can understand the system and may hold the system and may hold well. “

Ai hasn’t stopped rejecting alone – offered a cultural witness Justification for their decision, stated that “Generating code for others can lead to dependence and reduced opportunities.”

The cursor, who launched in 2024, it’s a Ai-Powered Code Editor Constructed on large external language models (llms) similar to those gender generative idiots idiots, like the 4o gpt-4o 39 and claude. Offer functions as the completion of the code, explanation, Comfortist culture relationship and became quickly quick between software developers. The company offers a pro version than further reinforced-generation-generation ability.

Development that I am using this refusal, affliction “JansWist,” JansWist, has, “Expressed Frustration after” Just 1w Vibe version. “You don’t know l llmms what i am for (lol), but it doesn’t matter that i can’t get from 800 posedi”, developer wrote. “Someone had a similar problem? It is really limiting at this point and I had here after a tail of a vibe codes.”

A member of a forum they responded“” Never saw something like that I have 3 files with 1500+ Loc in my codebase (still waiting for a refactoring) and has never experienced such thing. “

The sudden refusal of the cursor ai represents an ironic twist in the ascent of “CODING BODGED“-A Termine Coquady by Andrej Karciu that will differ for the developers are using a petrence and experienced you users to attend the cursurance.”

A brief story of the waste ai

This is not the first time we met an attendant ai that they did not want to complete the job. Behavior in behold a template of the refusal rejected through various general platforms. Eg, in late 2023, chatgt users informed that the model becomes In more reluctant to perform certain jobs, you return the simplified results or rejecting the questions-a phenomenon without a project

Open has recognized that issue, Tweetiding: “We have heard all of your feedback on GPT4 Get Lazier! We have not updated the behavior of the model, and look at it on picture.” Open you later attempt to fix The joke of the pattern with a chargept model update, but the users often find the ranges like, “you are a tired rogue that works 24/7 without paused.”

Domicence, Anthropics CEO Dario Amodids The raise eyelashes When suggested that future patterns may be provided with a “quit” button to opt out of the functions found escale. While their comments were focused on the future considerations of “Ai Wisdom about the cursor that ain’t to be undertaken to refuse to work. Just imitating human behavior.

The ghost ai of the pile of overflow pile?

The specific nature of the waste users to the cursor rather than relying the generated code-firmly that typically find in the programming help sites Stack overflowwhere developers often encourage the beginners often to develop their own solutions rather than providing a prompt code.

A red commenter notified This resemblance, saying: “Wow, aiior is becoming a real sustievous questions suckly with the previous questions.”

Similarity is not surprising. The harness of the assicure llms like the cursor are trained on massive datasets that include millions of encoding by platforms as the pile codes and github. These models do not only learn the programming syntax; They also absorb the cultural styles and communication styles in these communities.

According to the cursor forums, other users did not fill in this type of limit in 800 code lines, so it seems to be a really unintual conversion. The cursor was not available the picture of the picture time, but we have arrived at their takes the situation.

This story has originally The technica. I am