In one Tuesday statementAI Startup Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodai, called A.I. Action summit “Missed opportunity” in Paris this week, and the AI industry – and requested the government to “move forward with faster and more clarity.”
“We were happy to attend the AI Action Summit in Paris, and we appreciate the French government efforts to bring AI companies, researchers and policymen from around the world,” Amodie said. “However, many topics need more attention and urgent in view of the motion that is making technology progress.”
A.I. The latest in the Council category, the latest in the category of Councils, has the echoes of several scholars, criticizing AMDE’s criticism of the action summit, AI companies and regulators to try to reach unanimous AI governance. One told the transformer That the council’s commitments, Which US And the UK refused to signSaid, “Nothing effectively except platitudes.”
In the comments at the conference, US Vice President JD Vens Adopted a completely different attitude and condemned the “greatly” and strict rules on the AI champions championed by Europe. Indicating the words “durable” and “incorporated” in the conference commitments, Vens also raised the issue with content mediation, which he rejected as “dictatorial censorship”.
Amodai warned in his statement that AI was becoming more sophisticated quickly, and failing to control it could have catastrophic consequences.
“The capabilities of AI systems will be considered equal to the whole new state with the population of very intelligent people appearing on the global stage,” Amodie said. “Advanced AI represents significant global security risks, from non-state actors to abuse of AI systems … we must be sure to lead democratic societies in AI, and the dictatorial countries will not use it to establish global military dominance.”
Amodei urged governments to deploy their resources to measure how AI was being used, and to formulate a policy to ensure that everyone distributes a very powerful AI to the economic (uplift). He also argued for more government transparency when it comes to a plan to evaluate AI risks.
AMODE AUMBLY OF AMEDEEE OF THE PROGRES OF THE PERIS AI Summit is against OpenAI, which says in one The statement this week It was believed that this conference would be “Another important landmark for everyone’s responsible and beneficial development for AI.”
In the past anthropic usually shows openness for AI regulation. Really, Amodi has created Uniform announcement BeforeBe careful that inseparable AIs can have negative economic, social and security effects. Anthropic was one of the little AI companies Expertise California’s SB 1047, a comprehensive – and hot discussion – AI regulatory bill. Open opposed the bill, which was given a veto by Governor Gary Newsum in the last fall.
It is not to indicate that the purposes of anthropic are completely philanthropic. Like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Recent essayAmodai does not offer any concrete recommendations to ensure the benefits of powerful AI, if it emerges in the near future, it is widely and evenly distributed.
Read our full coverage Artificial intelligence action summit in Paris.
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/53202070940_ea57312b1a_k.jpg?resize=1200,800
