Danny Obromrivka »Blog Archive» A New Oral Culture

I work in a perfect (most) remote organization. Within that organization, I associate with a more decentralized ecosystem. Some of the people I am with the other orgs, some individual contractors are volunteer, some conglomerations in the mystery-monlomered mystery-monkenered mystery-monskered mystery-monskered-typhes. A remarkable amount of my and my colleagues are intended to make this whole system less confused and confusing.

We spend a lot of time relieved people this Fot-of-of-Feats is one of the consequences of decent bureaucralization or an escaping market? It will definitely feel more difficult, in the same way I have found other horizontal non-organizations (such as noise) more challenging to parse than more orgs. There is a reason why looking like a state talk is very good about goodness. Things built in other ways in the standard top-down system should invent their own ways to estimate, or they hide their actions completely new, unstoppable behavior.

One year or more, I described one of the failures: modern remote, distributed, environmentally published on the internet, I have done it oral culture. And yes, this is me, trapped at the end of nostalgic stimulation, crying through the old memory of an (non-existent emails, and beautiful wikis, and good wikis of RFCs, And very good emails; and also I wiped youtube videos, and zoom signs, and the Tiktiks and DMS.

But to be honest, it’s not part of the internet less literory or some knee disables. It’s about Multi-modality in the real world discussion with the cram of himself in another, narrower space. Writing is that, of course, a masar shape: but it’s a compression we have a lot of familiar with, and lots of scaffolding to support. The oral oral se, as a medium of communication to himself, may have dried in a little more, back to the real world. We move it to performance and scenery. Its impairment and distance from writing makes it a form that cannot be determined for the difference. It sits on phone and radio calls, respond to machines and tannys. Oral histories are anything else: transcripts, and hard to explain.

And now, no matter what, it will come back – and it should continue more. I predicted, years ago, increasing public information, but I did not imagine being pushing for many highband pipes, so it could easily move out of literature, “video”, in … Whatever it is. This chit-chat is async glimmer in many conversations, hemming and judging and attempting to repair the implementation of ephemererity.

it isalaynow again. We talked and then suddenly didn’t understand, and the disagreement jumped from conversation until conversation faster than we could keep track of. No one is on the same page, because no pages – scrolls and backscrolles.

I’m not really muddling with it: An exciting path, another thing that asks for tools. And bringing, like the dock leaves, appears easy on Nettle: I love how AI heard of the orality, and it is expected to be together. Local AIS, at least; AIS is ours, not the wider caution, working to make everything, so the state can see everything.