Defi is no longer detective of the center – decentralization is disrupted

Packague: Artem Tolkachev, Web3 Investor

Defective finance (Defii) When the first appearance is first appeared, the main idea is simple: lack of financial freedom, transparency and centralized control. Wise agreements were needed instead of banks, liquidity, and the users had to be fully monitored.

It’s sounded like a dream. The people have been accepted as a dream and adoption Defi Despite technical issues, despite poor UX and low liquidity. Over the past two years, the Defid is solving most of serious problems and is developing seriously.

The basic concepts of decentrality and freedom have been fired. The integrated harmony that seems completely uniformly unnaturally unlimited to this ecosystem.

Previously, the main risk risk of the Defe was a wise contracting hatred and liquidity. Today, the greatest danger comes from the greatest danger. Users turn to their own funds, you will not be able to lose their own funds.

There is no clear regulatory body to protect users. Defi projects are introducing mechanisms, but users are not fully protected from potential misuse. This, especially, is created as a regulation, but the users are now legitimately legally applicables (AML) legal appeal.

How does the compatibility with Cryptor work?

Mechanism of traditional financial and harmonization of conformity is aimed at preventing taxation, tax evasion and terrorism. Within Crypto, transaction shall be kept by monitoring and purse.

Individual analytics firm form the central risk assessment models and appoint a risk of risk to the wallest on the basis of criteria to be considered. These services are not closed and unintered, but regulators use licensing exchanges and services within the last ten years.

Last: Defi is installed for a long, strong defi Summer

Each user is a number of a number of “politely polluted” on the surface of the grapes. If one wallet is marked as suspicious, all the wallet related to it may be sanctioned. In most cases, this happens in the past. At first, the security is considered to be safe, later the risk of danger. As a result, their colleagues may not control their colleagues during interaction during interaction. Innocent addresses are blocked and allow you to access.

This may not affect the hyfi, as well as the provision of licensed assets (VAZPS) to provide services of licensed assets (VAZPS) to providership (VAZPS) to providership (VAZPS). Banks and Payment Providers can cover the accounts based on such triggers, if the address is clean in the original transaction, if the address is clean. The faithfulness of such evaluation and questions about the solution to the dispute and questions about the solution of controversy.

Fundamental shortcomings in the wallet monitoring system are not analyzing the actual nature of transactions. If the “red flag” is given in any wallet in the transaction chain, it may be enough to block the user. This approach is not liable for Aml Conformity or sanctions on traditional value. Even accurate banking adequacy is not banned without automatic ban, but includes investigations in suspicious activities.

Defi makes not just inaccurate rules and protection, but it makes it harder than traditional banking.

To reduce the risk, users can advance wallet for potential sanctions. Allows you to concentrate your risk on your wallet and contract. Of course, this is a foolish decision, and the suspect may not prevent sorn symptoms, but it provides several visions before dealing with hydropower platforms.

Why do they use compliance with protection projects?

This is because regulators intensify and want to avoid security activities to prevent securities and exchange activities, financial action and foreign assets. This is especially for the surrounded areas with registered in the United States, EU, EU and other regulated jurisdictions.

Judicial proceedings and administrative activities reflected fear and uncertainty. Conformity and monitoring of conformity and sanctions have become subsequent priorities from other exchange activities. Employees and conformity and conformity and contempt from potential sanctions and legal risks are preferred to be excessive and even prefer to perform them.

In most cases, it is difficult to resist these requirements, and the founders find it difficult to violate the basic principle of destruction between users and their means.

Regulatory uncertainty is only part of the picture. Many projects need to be funded by the central firms, which require comprehension of aml / KYC standards. In addition, the time they work to developers as a certain legal entity, they actively carry out their own and investors facilitating risks.

Another reason is pseudo decentralization. Some projects use the word “Defi”, but in fact, centralized entities. They try to prevent the reduction of litrl and sanctions, using wallet blocks, and inspection processes. As a result, the deficiency is entering into cefi but no centralized system guarantees.

Defi coat with regulation?

Privacy do not miss, but it can be done more open. One potential approach is that users decide to decide to find out from your client (K)Yc) to contact specific protocols. This proceeds may form multiple momiesystems, where others are as autonomic as possible.

The mechanisms of broadcasting, open broadcasting, may be provided by the technical perspective and open broadcasting. On the contrary, it can use the mechanisms managed by “cutting” wallet, projects by dedicated autonomous organizations based on decisions of the center. These users allow users to block the wallet, participate in the resolution of disputes, without opposing controversy sanctions.

Another option is the development of “net” liquidity basin pool, where assets are not a pre-determined criteria than in open, pre-determined criteria. This can reduce the risk of the arbitration by conserving a certain level of regulation of the settlement of this level.

All of these mechanisms require a balanced approach. If Defile Protocols introduce centralized conformity mechanisms, they introduce centralized exchange mechanisms to control several people. It helps to maintain a balanced harmony between regulating harmony and the balance between the user and the user’s ability to regulate the use of decision-making solutions.

There is a alternative perspective: if there is a definition, you are uniformly deceived by centralized teams, and if there is no regulated point. The question arises as whether this issue is real in today’s environment. Most users still choose a convenient UI instead of interaction with Smart Agreements.

Prospens of Defe

If the defley continues to go on behalf of the secret harmony, then it’s its main advantage is lost – decentralization of the center. For several years, we have not seen the free financial market, but poor UX and wallet blocks can see a new form of centralized platforms.

There is still an opportunity to change this trajectory. It helps to develop the development of new regulatory models, developing mechanisms and accurate distribution between the CEFII, which is independent of industry.

The conformity should not be a secret censorship. It can serve as a tool for protection of users and projects – if not unresolved decisions and non-mass wallet, but unconsciously implemented.

So far, users need to check the wallet regularly for potential sanctions

Packague: Artem Tolkachev, Web3 investor.

This article is carried out for general information purposes, not required and not accepted as legal or investment council. The views and ideas that are spoken here do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the goal.