Business News

DRAX power is not really green – but Britain needs

Unlock editor’s digestion for free

DRAX Power Station, who dominated North Campaign near Selby for more than one half a century, it was given Another lease of life this week. Pantina generation the biomass with 12 cooling cake route in indino indined to be 083, thanks to the renewal support of the government.

DRAX was built as a coal coal plant in 1974 and then converted into burning wood pellets. He got away much others but longevity does not equate the popularity. From the green campaign to the conservative party, that resembles its support after the office last year, it is derated to be, as a post-card scum. “

This accounts for the defensive tone of the announcement with fresh returning to DRAX and the fact that bursu, energetic secretary, did not do in person. Michael Shanks is open to its teacher of the Englus About the Consoners to the 2027 in the subsid of the subsid.

This is a painful compromant but still a necessary. It only helps the ambition of billibre for Britain to clean the electrical of 2030 if you believe that the emission of burned wood is different to do. But DRAX has a clear advantage on new nuclear energy stations that the government is Backing For the energy transition: already exists.

Actions in DRAX, society that a power station, siaise on the news because of the news because of the parkings and because the market does not believe in a militas. Neither should. Many complex and costly investments are required without delay to make the electrical to make it better and reduce the generation of fuel energy to the rifle. It’s safe to assume that DRAX will be with us for some time.

The benefits drax by peculiar regulatory arbitrage that results in the biomass power generation are assessed under the United Kingdom and European Roar standards. The ponies are important to the north America as sorrows renew that their issues are taller than any emissions are higher than any other plant of the …, as per group of research emirna. It was too Ended £ 25mn Last year to not keep dating data from sourcing.

This environmental trick is no longer convincing. DRAX says its emissions are balanced from the fact that carbon’s absorbed trees are regrown to make pellets. Maybe so but to ignore compulations is absurd. Biomass must fall somewhere between the power of wind and foss fuel in the green ledger.

But the environmental imperfection of DRAX is a poor argument for turning off to finish all the support, as well as you wanted. This would risk 5 percent of the future of the United Kingdom and his gray dependence (to the European interconnectors) for the time of solar generation.

The counting wind for 30 percent of the Ék electrical in the UK UK last year. But his expansion does not abandon the need for biomass plants that can be activated when they are needed. Indeed, the DecarBagonises System, PL Fragile can become the business their activity for Ragavolo.

A declaring study last year from the national policy center has concluded that the UK may require the most gunfires to maintain generation in future. The officer’s officers of the national energy system, which has warned of the rate of change “to the limit of what is feasible”, support the retention of DRAX

The government has tacitly granted the point. Instead of dealing with a renewable energy source in a conventional financial manner, the trait is enough as a capability contract with a gas operator. DRAX remain in service but will not operate over half of today’s levels and “excessive profits”

It’s not clear what happens after 2031, when the trait is meant to escape. DRAX wants to install carbon capture and storage equipment so that you don’t issue more greenhouse gases and can shop in emissions credits. This technology is unstopped and very expensive, although draft has a record to keep a step in front of obsolescence.

I bet on more delays, not just to the coal catches, but to the bulk’s schedule of the milians. That is the message of this week trait with DRAX. Have an admirable vision but risk the lights by running closing an unpopular energy station would be reckless.

John.GApper@ft.com


https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fe18ebbcf-3704-493d-8300-673e8adbad1a.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1

2025-02-13 08:00:00

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button