In order to return the payments received from the hack transactions from the hack transactions

Confidentiality of the centralized Financial Protocol of the Biftiness (Defi) was behind the proposal that required the return of the protocol (Defibi) using digital assets of the Lazarus group used digital assets using digital assets.

The proposal was on March 4 Published 44.67 airized essential (VET) centralized autonomous organization (Wet), up to Almost $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000, $ 100,000.

The proposal was originally attracted skepticism with several members of the doo Call To verify before improving the offer. Babylon shared On March 5, your official X-check post on the back of this proposal that it was behind this proposal.

In order to repay the funds, it has caused controversy among dairy members, including the future revenues of future fees.

Paraswap publicizes potential consequences

Defi Researcher and Pelvpop Dopolya Diopons, declaring Daebo, and dilemma, placed on Dao.

Ignas said The “bad optics” that will be paid from Dao hak and refund supports another industrial player. It added that the storage of means can be a regulatory check and legal scatter diseases.

However, he warned that the Defrie was set to be a dangerous precept for the Defrie:

“The code is the law. Dao has found legal fees through intelligent agreements. If the funds are now refunded, what about the future? Sets a dangerous precedent.”

The paragraph delegation also said that the hachers could have touched the stolen money to a toasawapoint. On February 27, the exchange rate of the retina was $ 30 billion in exchange Have used the protocol Replace digital assets.

Treak until March 4 There were $ 5 million in feesand its volume reached $ 5.4 billion. Bibbit hackers used the protocol to convert fees. If the Bibit strikes the retina as a similar background request, exchange can be restored much more.

For comment, the faulty to say, but not immediately received the answer.

Related: $ 1.5b Crypto Hack loss loss

Bybit Recommendations Ignites Ignites Surceut

Described by Dos member’s Seed Gov three Courses: Possible action: return the full amount, refuse to refuse or structured refund to keep The bubble is 10% in 10% of the current error program.

The public planted a dispute in the Parasavad Djoo Forum. Some community members said need to be repaid. If others were able to save 10% of the foundations, they were able to organize the structured refillment of funds safe Eliminate future commitments for Dao.

On the other hand, some Pelvaba’s members opposed the return of these funds to Babylon. Member of the community said If it agrees to return the means, he may be harmed by the Parravab to damage his father’s destruction.

Another DAO member mark look like situation The protocol in 2013, when the protocol, requested the protocol to pay the protocol to pay off the protocol refund. The DJA member stressed the decision to refund for a timely manner, and he stressed that he said, “It’s no reason to manage this time.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmj6R4r4So

Magazine: Oxis related to 3c, an oxen, rejects almighty words, and BBIVer goes to war: Asia expressress