It was wrong in his divorce to refuse sex. A European court disagreed.

The couple had been together for some three decades before they divorced. She blamed her job for taking a toe in her marriage. But in 2019, a French court was not the only one to blame him for sending her, after she had refused to have sex with him.

Top human rights court of Europe the Joviano condemned that request, saying that the decision of the French court had violated the good history and autonomy, which included his sexual life. The decision was seen as a commitment to the rights of women who have regard to and concerns a marriage law of France.

The 2019 decision by the court of Versailles said that the woman, identified only as HW in the court documents, was in the square in the divorced after stopping “with the husband. His refusal of years to be intimate with her husband, which the court said: It was a “serious violence” re repone “of her marital duties.

But the European front of the Right, saying that the government had an obligation of domestic violence that is contrary to a sexual freedom and to the right to contract the sexual body “.

He added: “The court cannot accept, as the government suggests, that consent to marriage implies an accident to futile sexual relations.”

It was a symbolic victory for the woman, who supported her that she should not be found at FUUL in the divorce. Rights groups called the decision a fundamental step to address sexual violence and other forms of abuse against women in relationships.

“I hope that this decision points a point of tut of women for i. The Rights of And women in France,” HW say in a statement through their notice, Delphine Zoughebi. “This victory is for all the women who, like me, find themselves with surrey equipment and inserts that call out the demand and their right to privacy.”

Hw and jC, as her husband was identified in documents, who lived outside Paris, married in 1984 and had four children, the judge said. The woman began the devorar processes in 2012, at the beginning of the way of fire in his life from around his family, and that he had been “irritable, violent and pain.”

Her husband had argued in the French trio that it was his fault that brought him his marital bill. He should have sexual intimacy also with the accused.

The woman testified that she had refused to have sex because of health problems, including a serious accident and a slipped disc. The French court found in favor.

The French Government, acting in the Cont Trio, had supported the punishment put on a pacifier, and it punished that the French law beats in front of the edge A portazante for Diego colas, an officer who repeated the most organized in short, decreased to a short answer to Gérald -minin, the justified justice.

“Obviously we will go in the direction of history and forget our law” “Mr. Darbanin said the reporters. He said that he encouraged people to discuss the matter.

Both parties have three months to refer the case to the court of the European Court, which can consider the case for a final judgment. Once it is issued, a committee of government representatives for the Member States of the Court Supervises its Enforcement. The European Court does not have a response mechanism, but its rulings can prompt countries to re-introduce their laws.

Conversations around a mutual access, culture and sexual violence have turned off in France in the most recent months, led by the hartering case in which 51 men convicted of sexual violation of the pelicot gisèle. Ms. Expenses of Ms. Pelicot, pelicot dominique, admitted to drugging and kidnapping for almost a decade, and inviting dozens to join him.

Lilia Mhissen, another lawyer represented Fiutendu Fiutendu, said to the race He had to impapa French from the French coast to interring the legd so that he would have sex with his partners. She called it “An important development for the right of women to control their bodies, including marriage.”

The group of women directors, a group of women directors, said that the government had brought France “FACE to face with its responsibilities”. He called on the government to review its judicial practices, adding that feminist groups had agreed that the notion of “Civil duty and sexual violence.

“Marriage can never be equated with sexual slavery,” the group said.