Latest Tech News

Section 31 is now the lower star project of star on pumers

By the time Star Trek: Section 31 squeezed on the paracaz + last week, he did with a malfunction – and landed with a tudtemth thud. I am The first Trek star the film (streaming or otherwise) in years was immediately thrown by many criticsReappers now have been happy fans and warping Section 31 right in the first place on the most lists of lists.

As well as Forbes Reports, Section 31 Now held the “honor” of being the worst Trek star PROJECT, TV series or film, on tomatoes potted punctures, both in trace of critics and by user input. Here’s the full disappearance of the two film and series of TV series:

Trek star Movies rotures tarmatoes

  • Star Trek: The moving picture: 52% critical, 42% of audience
  • Star Trek II: Khan’s IRA: 86% critical, 90% audience
  • Star Trek III: The spock search: 79% critical, the 68% public
  • Star Trek IV: The journey home: 81% critics, the 81% public
  • Stella Trek v: Final Frontier: 23% criticism, 25% of the audience
  • Star Trek you: The Uniscuovered country: 83% critical, the public 83%
  • Star Trek: generations: 47% criticism, 57% hearing
  • Star Trek: The first contact: 93% critical, audience 89%
  • Star Trek: insurrection: 55% criticism, 44% Uududi
  • Star Trek: Nemesis: 38% critical, twelve 49%
  • Trek star (2009): the critics of 94%, Udicale 91%
  • Star Trek in the dark: 84% critics, Udineal 89%
  • Star Trek beyond: 86% critical, 80% kill
  • Star Trek: Section 31: 20% critical, 17% hearing

Trek star TV Rotten Rotten Rotten series

  • Trek star: 92% critical, n / an audience
  • Star Trek: The Brushed Series: 94% critical, the public 81%
  • Star Trek: The next generation: 92% critical, 90% hearing
  • Star Trek: deep space nine: 91% critics, the audience 89%
  • Stella Trek: Travel: 76% critical, your 80% telephone
  • Star Trek: Discover: 91% critical, 33% audience
  • Star Trek: Lower Decks: 91% critics, the public 73%
  • Star Trek: Picard: 89% review, 57% hearing
  • Star Trek: Product: 97% critical, audience 88%
  • Star Trek: NO NOW NIGHT: The critics 98%, the public of 79%

The entire franchise, as soon as another entry comes even remotely near Section 31 here in the form of the malignant Final boundary (what you do to do God needs with an extra Spock secret spock?), in terms of a critical reaction, reaction of audience, or potential disparity between those two assessments. Of course, as I whenever IMMATE Discuss: The first one is that the tomato powers, but not a test pearc, but a pair of possession of possession, numeric, numeral: Section 31 It is not the equivalent of a 2/10, instead that simply one in five criticisms have assessed.

It is also important to acknowledge that is a faulty system, especially contrast of historical data prior to the plan of concolute material. It is also No longer of a case when it comes to audience actions that suffer from a similar lack of historical data as to the problem that, before many recent people as they are checked and neckedthey were infamosely wicked wicked As part of “Review Bombing” annoyance of harassment for a third of third and dead in the crop of culture. (Case in a point, Star Trek: DiscoveryOverwhelfing disparity between critical and audience points on the list above, a show that is repeatedly bad-faith and backlash racist to the course of its correct.) for its important is turned the site entertainment and, for the worst people who discuss medians, it comes with their faulty recognition.

All he said that is probably is it something to take Section 31The widely negative reactions in the whole two audiences and critical. Not only stops in the oeuvre of Trek star‘s of actual streaming (regardless of what debris of Discovery Say on Alex Kurtzman’s product shepherd, for and great most contemporary Trek star been received rather well), but speak to the end controversy of the end of what a Trek star Project that Centers 31-a concept that was controversial by the moment has been introduced in Deep nine space-Fo. Going, the movie had a high expectation to justify any potential glamorization of an infamely insidious group, one that their existence has been seen as tantamount to a bulk rejection of Trek star‘Underworld of Bolered. Instead, took another worst than that glamorization in simply only to nothing with the opportunity of section 31 as an entity or even Trek star wider.

Trek star It stops a bit of crossword that his modern age has not really seen in a while. The recent conclusions of Picard pic, Discoveryand it Decks lower-Arily the flagships that define the shopping boom in was streaming and the future uncertain of Prodigy After its incorplation optouling by the parable +, leaves Trek in a strange place. Strange new worldsone of the most refilled projects received from this was now with just a bunch of projects that Venenness, and, as was the case Beyondrelease of whatever the hell If you go Trek star Movies remain so nebulous the chief can go looking for coffee all over. Trek needed Section 31 To prove that you couldn’t fill in movie that brings a moment to uncertain, if you were not started with a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​an idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea of ​​an idea Fundamental of a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​an idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea of ​​a fundamental idea.

You want more IO9 news? Break up when you look forward to the latter Marvel, Star warand it Trek star Release, what is near for the Inters DC on the movie and tvAnd all you need to know about the future of Doctor that. I am


https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/01/star-trek-section-31-michelle-yeoh-phillipa-georgiou.jpg

2025-01-30 00:15:00

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button