Business News

Trump order on global tax agreement is a relief for technological companies

Some of the greens of technology stood behind the chairman donald trump the day of inauguration. Hours later, he sent a directive that has taught a potential fiscal headache from their plan.

In one of the many executive orderRs who signed on Monday, Trump reported that the USA did not promoted an agreement you looked for a “so-called the bottom of tax tax on the tax on the corporate income.

The first part of the solidifies order in the US is political on the maximum tax agreement, whereas in the second half, Trump has noticed to retriters whether other countries for American companies for Extra Tax, a threat that may have softly sounded to those. tech bigwigs.

“These are companies that may be concerned for a success”, he said Alan Cole Cole, Economist of Tax Foundation.

Left, Priscilla Chan, MKA CEO Markerberg, Maguen Schen, Jeff Bezos and Elon MUSGA inaise in the USAGILY of the USAgets in Washington, Monday 20 of January of 2025. (Sanced chip / pool photo via ap)
Left, Priscilla Chan, MKA CEO Markerberg, Maguen Schen, Jeff Bezos and Elon MUSGA inaise in the USAGILY of the USAgets in Washington, Monday 20 of January of 2025. (Sanced chip / pool photo via ap) CONTRACTURORY · OFFICE · Press associated with

The agreement reached in 2021 offers a two-part plan. Pillar One Dicta What the great multinational companies pay in the countries in the countries where their customers are located even if companies have no physical operations.

Pillar two, that the executive order targets, establish a 15% global tense fiscal fee. multination with a billed over the most of 750 million (~ $ 788 million), no matter where they operate. Also allow the villages that have adopted the pillar two of the fee submitted to the firms that pay the tax in the countries that have a tax rate under the minimum global.

“The goal of this is to fight the tax evasion and erosion of the tax base where multinutions transfer the swollen to high tax jurisdiction to low tax”, he said thomas Brosy, an individual search association in the Page Policy Center. . I am

For example, take the small island of Jersey, an autonomous of the United Kingdom of UK with his own tax jurisdiction. Now, if a company is running $ 1 billion through the island of 0%, but “takes a small fraction of this as a species of fee”, cole said , which are substantial money for the small island population and a large financial physical savings for the company.

“It is difficult for a regular country of competing with this because they actually want to increase the revenues because they have a lot of people to take care of,” said Cole.

The multinational business can turn global income from one country to another because their operations can cover several countries. When they need to make a judgment named for tax purposes, corporations “love to press in the direction of the low tax jurisdiction”, cole said.




https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/_XjCRFYvu6rIhHTnefAo6A–/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyMDA7aD04MDE-/https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2025-01/bd5d26e0-da67-11ef-aefc-e44b0635f60d

2025-01-24 19:23:00

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button